Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!decwrl!decwrl!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Install problem: cmd/data port full Date: 6 Mar 1994 23:32:31 GMT Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman MT Lines: 39 Message-ID: <2ldp6f$pa@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <2laempEa74@uni-erlangen.de> <2lb83u$5u0@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <MYCROFT.94Mar6144945@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu In article <MYCROFT.94Mar6144945@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>, Charles Hannum <mycroft@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> wrote: > >In article <2lb83u$5u0@pdq.coe.montana.edu> nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu >(Nate Williams) writes: > > Based on comments Julian has made, the code in FreeBSD 1.1 is alot > newer than any publically available SCSI code in NetBSD (either 0.9 > or -current) > > Stick with FreeBSD. > > Certainly the `new' SCSI >code I got from Julian (the same code which went into FreeBSD) was >*quite* buggy. Explain *certainly*? There are lots of folks who are using it w/out problems with FreeBSD, and it certainly works on the newer hardware much better than the code in any public code in NetBSD. >no real impetus for us to switch to the other code, as the known bugs >in the current code have been fixed. Hmm, the original author has problems yet that's not a known bug? I don't get it? In your world you're always right and never wrong, and anyone that disagrees with you is the bad guy with the wrong motives. Too bad real life ain't that way, huh? Nate -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | FreeBSD core member and all around tech. nate@cs.montana.edu | weenie. work #: (406) 994-4836 | Graduating May '94 with a BS in EE home #: (406) 586-0579 | - looking for work in CS/EE field.