*BSD News Article 28207


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!news.kei.com!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!ai-lab!life.ai.mit.edu!mycroft
From: mycroft@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development
Subject: Re: Bootblock for i386 developers?
Date: 06 Mar 1994 18:51:19 GMT
Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <MYCROFT.94Mar6135120@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
References: <2l8odf$h6k@nic.scruz.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu
In-reply-to: banshee@boing.resort.com's message of 5 Mar 1994 01:48:17 GMT


In article <2l8odf$h6k@nic.scruz.net> banshee@boing.resort.com (John
Vinopal) writes:

   Anyone working on boot blocks for free or net bsd?

I did quite a bit of work to `clean up' the BIOS boot block in
NetBSD-current.  I have not worked on the bad144 code, however.

   True theat freebsd1.1 deals better with >1024 cylinder drives?

The wd driver has worked with >1024 cylinders since 386BSD.  The BIOS
boot block cannot, because the BIOS simply won't do it.

--
- Charles Hannum
  NetBSD group
  Working ports: i386, hp300, amiga, sparc, mac68k, pc532.
  In progress: pmax, sun3.