*BSD News Article 28334


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.apps:1014 comp.os.linux.misc:10771
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.linux.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!hasty
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Subject: Re: DOOM for X
Message-ID: <hastyCMEw58.FMr@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <1994Mar3.131137.27311@infodev.cam.ac.uk> <CM44Lq.78x@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au> <2lkpg5$8hn@Tut.MsState.Edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 1994 19:15:07 GMT
Lines: 28

In article <2lkpg5$8hn@Tut.MsState.Edu> simmons@EE.MsState.Edu writes:
>In article <CM44Lq.78x@seagoon.newcastle.edu.au>,
>Pat Breen <c9220321@sage.newcastle.edu.au> wrote:
>>: I mailed him, and he said that although he's working under Linux, he wants the
>>: port to be a generic X11 port, rather than a Linux specific port.  Hence not
>>: using svgalib.
>>
>>Hmmm... I spose for the average Linux user, that aint so good...
>>Anyone interested in possibly getting an svgalib version going - would
>>anyone consider it for speed's sake??
>
>The X version should be just as fast as an svgalib version, because
>David Taylor is using the shared memory extentions of X.  Hence,
>no real need for an svga version.
>

I really doubt that a direct access to a fast svga card on a local bus would
compare in performance to the client-server model of X.

If you ask me X is very, very broken in this respect. 

Amancio

-- 
FREE unix, gcc, tcp/ip, X, open-look, interviews, tcl/tk, MIME, midi, sound
at  freebsd.cdrom.com:/pub/FreeBSD
Amancio Hasty,  Consultant |
Home: (415) 495-3046       |  
e-mail hasty@netcom.com	   |  ftp-site depository of all my work:    
ahasty@cisco.com           |  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/X