Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!CERN.ch!tifrvax.tifr.res.in!bhiksha From: bhiksha@tifrvax.tifr.res.in (R Bhiksha Raj) Subject: RE: Stable *BSD for Intel Message-ID: <16MAR94.14393114@tifrvax.tifr.res.in> Sender: news@news.cern.ch (USENET News System) Organization: Tata Institute of Fundamental Research References: <2l81of$rmp@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <CMGMoA.F03@apollo.hp.com> <2lqd2a$12e@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <1994Mar15.205532.19577@pegasus.com> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 1994 14:39:31 GMT Lines: 13 In a previous article, richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) wrote: >>>3) NetBSD-current appears to be quite stable, though until very >>> recently it still had some lingering bugs in the wd driver which >>> could result in data loss. > >Just curious (not trolling for flames here, really); if xBSD is having >trouble with its veablefeltzer driver and yBSD has a functioning one, >then do the dev-gods crib from the yBSD implementation or scratch build? > >How much coordination is there between x and y? > Sounds like a metaphysical algebra exam :-)