Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:57404 comp.unix.bsd:13598 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!convex!convex!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cyber2.cyberstore.ca!nwnexus!ole!rwing!eskimo!buddy From: buddy@eskimo.com (Steven Horn) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: BSD vs. Linux Message-ID: <CMK8E9.EM5@eskimo.com> Date: 12 Mar 94 16:27:36 GMT References: <1994Mar8.141900.2906@wubios.wustl.edu> <2lk1jm$aor@simpson-01.cs.strath.ac.uk> Organization: Eskimo North (206) For-Ever Lines: 10 gpalmer@cs.strath.ac.uk (Gary J Palmer C.S.3) writes: >*BSD : Lots of easily available C progs to compile & run easily. > Bigger kernel, so more memory needed. >Linux: Pain to get some (most?) BSD progs to work. > Smaller kernel, can run comfortably in 4Mb's. How much memory do you recommend to run *BSD??