Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel Date: 10 Mar 1994 04:53:57 GMT Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman MT Lines: 27 Message-ID: <2lm955$qep@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <2l4r3i$cb6@hq.hq.af.mil> <2l81of$rmp@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <2lm248$22a@fw.novatel.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu In article <2lm248$22a@fw.novatel.ca>, Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@sidney> wrote: >Nate Williams (nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu) wrote: >: FreeBSD 1.1 is more stable than any other public release of *BSD you'll >: find. > >I once had a car salesman tell me that the line of automobiles he was >presenting were undoubtedly the most reliable and economical line of >cars on the planet. This to me was an instant indication that he knew >absolutely nothing about cars; so I left his lot and bought elsewhere. *laugh* Ahh, yes Herb. You're absolutely correct, I know absolutely nothing about anything. ;-) I stand by my statement, and have you prove me wrong. I've already went through that with another person you know, I invite you to do the same. My experience and others attest to the above. (People running various release of *BSD I've known and my own experience back up my claim) Nate -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | FreeBSD core member and all around tech. nate@cs.montana.edu | weenie. work #: (406) 994-4836 | Graduating May '94 with a BS in EE home #: (406) 586-0579 | - looking for work in CS/EE field.