*BSD News Article 28443


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel!olivea!hal.com!decwrl!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate
From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel
Date: 10 Mar 1994 04:53:57 GMT
Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman  MT
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <2lm955$qep@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
References: <2l4r3i$cb6@hq.hq.af.mil> <2l81of$rmp@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <2lm248$22a@fw.novatel.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu

In article <2lm248$22a@fw.novatel.ca>, Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@sidney> wrote:
>Nate Williams (nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu) wrote:
>: FreeBSD 1.1 is more stable than any other public release of *BSD you'll
>: find.
>
>I once had a car salesman tell me that the line of automobiles he was
>presenting were undoubtedly the most reliable and economical line of
>cars on the planet.  This to me was an instant indication that he knew
>absolutely nothing about cars; so I left his lot and bought elsewhere.

*laugh*

Ahh, yes Herb.  You're absolutely correct, I know absolutely nothing
about anything. ;-)

I stand by my statement, and have you prove me wrong.  I've already went
through that with another person you know, I invite you to do the same. 
My experience and others attest to the above.  (People running various
release of *BSD I've known and my own experience back up my claim)


Nate
-- 
nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu     |  FreeBSD core member and all around tech.
nate@cs.montana.edu          |  weenie.
work #: (406) 994-4836       |  Graduating May '94 with a BS in EE 
home #: (406) 586-0579       |  - looking for work in CS/EE field.