*BSD News Article 28529


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!newshub.nosc.mil!nosc!pegasus!richard
From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk)
Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel
Message-ID: <1994Mar15.205532.19577@pegasus.com>
Organization: Pegasus,  Honolulu
References: <2l81of$rmp@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <CMGMoA.F03@apollo.hp.com> <2lqd2a$12e@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 94 20:55:32 GMT
Lines: 13

>>3) NetBSD-current appears to be quite stable, though until very
>>   recently it still had some lingering bugs in the wd driver which
>>   could result in data loss.

Just curious (not trolling for flames here, really); if xBSD is having
trouble with its veablefeltzer driver and yBSD has a functioning one,
then do the dev-gods crib from the yBSD implementation or scratch build?

How much coordination is there between x and y?


-- 
Richard Foulk		richard@pegasus.com