Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel
Date: 26 Mar 94 18:09:26
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <CGD.94Mar26180926@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <2l81of$rmp@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <2lqd2a$12e@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
<1994Mar15.205532.19577@pegasus.com>
<MYCROFT.94Mar17222306@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
<2mnb20$8us@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu's message of 22 Mar 1994 17:48:48 GMT
In article <2mnb20$8us@pdq.coe.montana.edu> nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes:
>Tell me what these particular 'stability' problem were Charles, so the
>rest of us can know, since I'm not aware of them.
well, i saw at least one piece of mail go by in which the author
of the mail claimed that the new FreeBSD wd driver did "Bad Things" (TM)
to his file systems...
cgd
--
chris g. demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
you can eat anything once.