*BSD News Article 28937


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2146 comp.os.linux.misc:11945
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!ponderous.cc.iastate.edu!michaelv
From: michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Impressions: FreeBSD vs Linux
Date: 29 Mar 94 14:01:18 GMT
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <michaelv.764949678@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu>
References: <1994Mar18.084355.19503@atlas.com> <CMzw69.92K@tower.nullnet.fi> <Cn1yJz.LHI@hippo.ru.ac.za> <1994Mar28.120648.5899@atlas.com> <2n8laa$668@lace.Colorado.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ponderous.cc.iastate.edu

In <2n8laa$668@lace.Colorado.EDU> atk@agua (Alan Krantz) writes:

>As I see it the major difference (from a user impact perspective) is that
>FreeBSD has better network code and Linux has shared libraries. Give FreeBSD
>shared libraries and I would probably pick it over Linux...

>atk

Both NetBSD-current and FreeBSD-current have had shared libraries
since around October last year.  The impending release of FreeBSD 1.1
has shared libraries, and NetBSD 1.0, when it comes out (before the
end of the summer, I would hope) will also have them in a major
release.

I've been running shared libraries in my NetBSD-current machine since
mid-November.

(NetBSD-current and FreeBSD-current are the freely available
development sources for the next major releases of the respective
Operating Systems.)

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Michael L. VanLoon                 Iowa State University Computation Center
    michaelv@iastate.edu                    Project Vincent Systems Staff
  Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free Un*x for PC/Mac/Amiga/etc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -