Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!sylvester.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail From: vax@sylvester.cc.utexas.edu (Vax) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD: iozone results Date: 4 Apr 1994 02:37:25 -0500 Organization: The University of Texas - Austin Lines: 8 Message-ID: <2nog3l$hqh@sylvester.cc.utexas.edu> References: <2no7ih$qq5@tut.msstate.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: sylvester.cc.utexas.edu My guess: The writes are faster than the reads because they are being cached and not physically ''written''. However, the reads must actually access the disk. -- Protect our endangered bandwidth - reply by email. NO BIG SIGS! VaX#n8 vax@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu - Don't blame me if the finger daemon is down