*BSD News Article 2903


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!dartagnan.rutgers.edu!hedrick
From: hedrick@dartagnan.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: UNIGRAM's article on the USL-BSDI suit
Message-ID: <Aug.1.14.20.05.1992.26479@dartagnan.rutgers.edu>
Date: 1 Aug 92 18:20:06 GMT
References: <1992Aug1.042344.23428@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU> <l7k5fqINNgc9@neuro.usc.edu> <l7k6maINNgeg@neuro.usc.edu> <l7k72rINNgfn@neuro.usc.edu> <leb.712651912@Hypatia> <peter.712682727@hilly>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 25

peter@micromuse.co.uk (Peter Galbavy) writes:

>Sorry, have I missed something ? Are you saying that if the University you 
>attended holds an academic source license, then only employers with 
>*commercial* (about >$100000) licenses should be *allowed* to employ you ? 

I believe speculation about being "contaminated" is without grounds.
It is possible to write contracts that prevent employees who work on
certain projects from working with any competitor, but (1) the Unix
licenses have no such clause, and (2) many such contracts are
unenforceable.  As far as restrictions on individuals, clearly the
only issue would arise with people who actually work with the source.
Even then, there's no clear evidence that USL would be able to cause
any trouble.  As far as I can tell, the claims in this case do not
rest on anything so ethereal as personal contamination, but on alleged
violation by Berkeley of copyright and trade secret.  I will say that
I have heard of a company that would not use anyone who had access to
Unix source in the group that was working on their own proprietary
operating system.  I think they were being more careful than
necessary, but I do understand why they are doing it.  However I think
the number of cases like that is small, and it certainly doesn't apply
to everyone at an institution that has source code.  Part of the
license agreement is that the institution is required to limit access
to people who actually need it, and that they must be told of their
obligations under the agreement.