Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!unix.sri.com!headwall.Stanford.EDU!kithrup.com!sef
From: sef@kithrup.com (Sean Eric Fagan)
Subject: Re: USL vs. 386BSD derivatives
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
References: <Joel.2.0011F385@infomagic.com>
Message-ID: <Cnv5x7.5C6@kithrup.com>
Keywords: USL, 386BSD
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 1994 00:41:17 GMT
Lines: 10
In article <Joel.2.0011F385@infomagic.com> Joel@InfoMagic.com (Joel Goldberger) writes:
>Is there any plan within the Net/Free/386BSD community to address these USL
>claims ?
Yes: move to the 4.4BSD-Lite release, when it becomes available. ("Soon,
soon!" says the man with the red beard over in the corner...)
I would suggest that all the groups get together and try to make it all
go smoothly, but, of course, that won't happen.