*BSD News Article 29318


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2278 comp.os.linux.misc:12642
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!news.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!reuter.cse.ogi.edu!uwm.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.uh.edu!not-for-mail
From: cosc19v2@menudo.uh.edu (cosc19v2)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,alt.magnus.and.ketil
Subject: Re: Impressions: FreeBSD vs Linux
Date: 9 Apr 1994 17:37:34 -0500
Organization: University of Houston
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <2o7ane$c6s@menudo.uh.edu>
References: <MAGNUS.94Apr3194958@haukugle.ii.uib.no> <MAGNUS.94Apr4201634@haukugle.ii.uib.no> <2o50rl$h11@u.cc.utah.edu> <2o6lrs$m7@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: menudo.uh.edu

In article <2o6lrs$m7@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>, lilo <lilo@slip-1-5> wrote:
>But the main thing is, why argue?  Everyone has a theory why the other
>operating system won't work, or won't work well.  AND YET BOTH LINUS AND THE
>BSD SYSTEMS *DO* WORK, AND WORK WELL.  Ask the people who USE them, as
>opposed to the people who COMPLAIN or SNICKER about them.

I am sick of these people who are whining that people are complaining. :) :)

Some *BSD people think that they are good at UNIX, but this is not true.
One proof is that people are saying, "We spent day and night to make things
work", but how can they write so BAD scripts for installation during so many
days and nights ?  Even a unix novice can write a nice script for a short
amount of time. Note that people who enters in UNIX on intel chips are not 
always Unix novices. The reason why they have trouble is that the system is 
different.  And the differences/conflicts can be resolved by good/correct 
documentation and  better installation scripts.

Installing NetBSD/FreeBSD  with DOS in single drive does not work and
the documentations are incorrect.  Please either correct them or remove them
so that naive people may not need to waste their valuable time.

>A lot of excellent work has gone into both.  THEY SHOW IT.
>
>Please take this thread to alt.flame, where it belongs.  It's serious flame
>bait, and not terribly constructive....

What do you want to be so constructive in this misc group ?

>lilo