Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:13718 comp.os.386bsd.questions:9715 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!news-feed-2.peachnet.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!apollo1.cacd.rockwell.com!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!ponderous.cc.iastate.edu!michaelv From: michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: TCP/IP performance of various BSD versions Date: 13 Apr 94 06:56:35 GMT Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Lines: 23 Message-ID: <michaelv.766220195@ponderous.cc.iastate.edu> References: <1994Apr13.031857.28789@chico.iecc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ponderous.cc.iastate.edu In <1994Apr13.031857.28789@chico.iecc.com> johnl@chico.iecc.com (John R Levine) writes: >I'm planning to switch from ISC Unix to one of the BSD versions on >this 486 box. The machine is directly connected to the Internet, so >TCP/IP performance and reliability are very important. >Without starting another War of the BSDs, can anyone give any experience >about the relative TCP/IP performance and reliability of Netbsd, Freebsd, >or BSDI? As far as I know, NetBSD and FreeBSD use essentially the same (quit excellent) ethernet drivers. I don't think this is an area where they differ much at all. With Western Digital/SMC 16-bit cards, full ethernet bandwidth is no problem with the standard ed driver. Don't have a clue what BSDI uses... -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Michael L. VanLoon Iowa State University Computation Center michaelv@iastate.edu Project Vincent Systems Staff Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free Un*x for PC/Mac/Amiga/etc. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -