Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!news.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.clark.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!udel!rochester!honeydew.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bhiksha From: bhiksha+@cs.cmu.edu (Bhiksha Raj) Subject: Re: Come now... Where's 1.1 Relese ? Message-ID: <Co20tJ.KK9.3@cs.cmu.edu> Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: speech1.cs.cmu.edu Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon References: <2nmo90$ncc@inet.up.ac.za> <JKH.94Apr3185314@whisker.hubbard.ie> <2np62r$8vo$1@perth.dialix.oz.au> <CnwC7I.JLG@latcs1.lat.oz.au> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 1994 17:34:30 GMT Lines: 21 M.C. Wong <wongm@latcs1.lat.oz.au> wrote: > >And certainly USL fails very badly again on FreeBSD merits for extending BSD >life after UCB announcement of their final release due to fund dry-up for >ongoing development. And imagine the PC markets FreeBSD will cover, and for >each PC installed with FreeBSD "a Unix [tm] like system ... blah blah blah" > >[tm] Unix is a trademark of USL <----- This sort of shit! Where is the merit of > BSD (and *BSD ?) > >The FreeBSD team is certainly doing a BIG favour for USL, and the worst being >that they get no money or whatsoever financial support for doing such a favour >for the community! My big salute to FreeBSD team here. > I second and third this statement :-) Anyway, I havent really understood what the situation is: What exactly does USL grouch about - the entire net-2 code or just parts of it? Has BSD 4.4 lite redone the entire net-2 code, in case of case 1?