Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!news.intercon.com!panix!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gumby!yale!yale.edu!noc.near.net!ipswitch!ddlgw!ddl From: ddl@harvard.edu (Dan Lanciani) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: *BSD ILLEGAL??? Message-ID: <304@ddlgw.UUCP> Date: 21 Apr 94 02:53:48 GMT References: <1994Apr16.225327.13287@belvedere.sbay.org> <CoIK1G.zvC@ns1.nodak.edu> Organization: Internet Lines: 15 In article <CoIK1G.zvC@ns1.nodak.edu>, tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu (Mark Tinguely) writes: | yesterday I recieved the licence agrrement forms for BSD 4.4-lite. Include | is a four page statement (double spaced)labeled simply: FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. | The letter breifly describes the history, conflict and resolution of the | dispute. It states that neither side admits the claims of the other... | | On page three, it says: " The settlement restricts further use of distribution | of certain files in the Second Networking Release and requires that certain | files in the 4.4 BSD-lite include a USL copyright notice. Is a list of the restricted files from NET/2 publicly available? Dan Lanciani ddl@harvard.*