Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2413 comp.os.linux.misc:13820 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: Impressions: FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <hastyCow25w.52B@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <2pfjmi$3j9@u.cc.utah.edu> <e8oDLc1w165w@oasys.pc.my> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 1994 22:51:32 GMT Lines: 21 In article <e8oDLc1w165w@oasys.pc.my> othman@oasys.pc.my (Othman Ahmad) writes: >terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) writes: > >> >> Actually, a better plan is a protected mode vm86() call so anything >> anyone wants to write in kernel space could make a BIOS call if it >> needed one. > >This may be called biosemu. > >Implementing this should be easier than dosemu. > Well Terry, the ball is now on your park :) Amancio -- FREE unix, gcc, tcp/ip, X, open-look, netaudio, tcl/tk, MIME, midi,sound at freebsd.cdrom.com:/pub/FreeBSD Amancio Hasty, Consultant | Home: (415) 495-3046 | e-mail hasty@netcom.com | ftp-site depository of all my work: ahasty@cisco.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/X