Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!foxhound.dsto.gov.au!fang.dsto.gov.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!sunic!trane.uninett.no!eunet.no!nuug!EU.net!ieunet!news.ieunet.ie!jkh From: jkh@whisker.hubbard.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: two questions, and a suggestion Date: 01 May 1994 01:49:54 GMT Organization: Jordan Hubbard Lines: 17 Distribution: world Message-ID: <JKH.94May1024854@whisker.hubbard.ie> References: <FOO-MAN.94Apr30132446@raven.raven.csrv.uidaho.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: whisker.hubbard.ie In-reply-to: foo-man@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu's message of 30 Apr 1994 20:24:46 GMT In article <FOO-MAN.94Apr30132446@raven.raven.csrv.uidaho.edu> foo-man@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu (Faried Nawaz) writes: a/ I'm compiling freebsd-1.1-gamma right now, and I see a lotta stuff that is being compiled with cc -p or cc -g (or both). is it generally safe to remove these (or replace them with cc -O)? You can set NOPROFILE=yes (or any value) in your environment to skip the -p's, at least. No sense in replacing them with -O's since optimization is used in all the other places it counts. can one line by added to the 1.0.2 --> 1.1 update script? it sez Sure, if freefall ever comes back up I'll be happy to make the change. Jordan -- Jordan K. Hubbard FreeBSD core team Friend to mollusks