Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!psgrain!hippo!spel From: spel@hippo.ru.ac.za (Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!! Message-ID: <1992Aug3.173429.16002@hippo.ru.ac.za> Date: 3 Aug 92 17:34:29 GMT References: <1992Jul30.173606.28357@kas.helios.mn.org> <1992Aug3.103210.4792@ohm.york.ac.uk> Organization: Katatura State Hospital, Windhoek, Namibia Lines: 21 In <1992Aug3.103210.4792@ohm.york.ac.uk> pete@ohm.york.ac.uk (-Pete French.) writes: >in article <1992Jul30.173606.28357@kas.helios.mn.org>, rhealey@kas.helios.mn.org (Rob Healey) says: >Out of inteerst - hwt are the implications of this case for people outside the >US who have already got NET2 ? Can we quite happily hang on to it until At&T >start sueing in Europe, and if not then why not ? Let them sue! Might be a wee bit difficult to find people who got the tape off the net. Even more so if it were located in The Commonwealth of Independet States, where there is no copyright law. greetings, el -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / (spel@hippo.ru.ac.ZA) Katatura State Hospital \ | (el@lisse.NA) Dept of Obstetrics & Gyn \ * / Private Bag 13215 Windhoek, Namibia ;____/ (postmaster@uonamib.NA) Postmaster NAmibia