Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:13999 comp.unix.admin:19490
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swrinde!pipex!uknet!EU.net!uunet!news.iij.ad.jp!wnoc-tyo-news!tweedledum!news.cc.uec.ac.jp!ikob
From: ikob@peer.cc.uec.ac.jp (Katshushi Kobayashi )
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: Port qi/CSO to BSD or BSDI 1.1 ???
Date: 22 May 94 13:43:31
Organization: The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan.
Lines: 12
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <IKOB.94May22134331@peer.peer.cc.uec.ac.jp>
References: <2rl1a6$q42@owl.csrv.uidaho.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: peer.cc.uec.ac.jp
In-reply-to: harri906@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu's message of 21 May 1994 13:11:34 GMT
In article <2rl1a6$q42@owl.csrv.uidaho.edu> harri906@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu (Harrington) writes:
Anyone ported qi/any CSO nameserver to BSDI 1.1 ?? I can't get
to compile right because of some stuff in the LEX part of the compile...
Well, CSO name server implementation may be based on standard lex
source output.The lex command on BSDI is based on FLEX system.The
intermediate source output is not compatible between them.
--
ikob@peer.cc.uec.ac.jp