*BSD News Article 30860


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:14040 comp.os.386bsd.development:2185
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!Germany.EU.net!news
From: bs@Germany.EU.net (Bernard Steiner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development
Subject: Re: More Details on the 386BSD Release 1.0 CD-ROM
Date: 25 May 1994 17:53:08 +0200
Organization: EUnet Deutschland GmbH, Dortmund, Germany
Lines: 21
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <2rvs94$avk@Germany.EU.net>
References: <jmonroyCq1qK0.5vJ@netcom.com> <JKH.94May20003442@nx.ilo.dec.com> <1994May20.075932.2931@resonex.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: qwerty.germany.eu.net


In article <1994May20.075932.2931@resonex.com>, michael@resonex.com (Michael Bryan) writes:
|> In article <JKH.94May20003442@nx.ilo.dec.com>,
|> Jordan Hubbard <jkh@nx.ilo.dec.com> wrote:
|> >This really looks to me like Bill hasn't really done much of anything
|> >with this, and is trying to make a final few bucks off the 0.1 bits
|> >repackaged in a nicer box before jumping ship altogether.  We should

|> from Mr. Monroy on this subject.)  I doubt that people will be
|> queueing up to waste $100 on a product with a dubious past at best,
|> and an even more questionable future.  At least, not until the 386BSD

I seem to recall that the ex-equivalent of DDJ in Germany, the UNIX Magazin,
had an article in it saying something about a "386bsd 0.2".

Obviously, this was a simple mis-print.

I am not totally convinced that this sort of thing cannot happen with DDJ
mixing the positions of the '0' and the '1' in "386bsd 1.0".

-Bernard