Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!nic-nac.CSU.net!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!olivea!decwrl!nntp.crl.com!crl2.crl.com!not-for-mail From: willr@crl.com (Todd Rodgers) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: More Details on the 386BSD Release 1.0 CD-ROM Date: 25 May 1994 06:07:46 -0700 Organization: CRL Dialup Internet Access Lines: 32 Message-ID: <2rvij2$ftn@crl2.crl.com> References: <jmonroyCq1qK0.5vJ@netcom.com> <1994May25.040649.28711@njitgw.njit.edu> <jmonroyCqCrwC.L5K@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: crl2.crl.com jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes: > In reference to your show of intelligence, > perhaps your just a bit annoyed that so many > people are jumping the Mach-boat? Oh really? What do you call the prominent Os/2 - WorkplaceOS kernels in existence? What kernel structure do you think NT looked at. NeXTStep, while not a great success, still exists heavily, and of course uses it religiously. Since the next version of Os/2 (and in fact, the betas recently released) depends on that mach subsystem for the kernel, I hardly call 5 million people using it as jumping the mach boat. As regards your reply in the first place, this is a development group, not a discussion group, where flames, be they incorrect or correct, should be withheld for those of us trying to accomplish something other than a lot of net traffic regarding a CDROM that really all we want is information on, not MicroSoft Hype. Personal comments are not necessary ... nor wanted. Todd Rodgers, Software Support Creditor Resources, Inc. -- Information in this article does not reflect my employers' opinions or wishes, only my own. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Use the buddy system; i.e., if you see a shark, feed it your buddy. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-