Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2515 comp.os.linux.misc:16199 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!frmug.fr.net!renux.frmug.fr.net!plux.frmug.fr.net!rene From: rene@renux.frmug.fr.net (Rene COUGNENC) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Linux vs *BSD (new twist) Date: 3 Jun 1994 12:58:49 GMT Organization: France, sweet France Lines: 13 Message-ID: <2sn9e9$7hg@renux.frmug.fr.net> References: <2sl6o3$pvs@aurora.engr.latech.edu> <2smc4m$daj@Mercury.mcs.com> Reply-To: cougnenc@hsc.fr.net (Rene COUGNENC) NNTP-Posting-Host: plux.frmug.fr.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Ce brave Daniel Leeds ecrit: > Yes. How does one justify that the bindist is not a useable system m8?? The reason why many of us (Linux users) use Linux and not BSD, is because Linux was useable long before 386BSD on our home machines. This includes Linus Torvalds himself :-) Today new users have the choice. It's a very good thing. -- linux linux linux linux -[ cougnenc@renux.frmug.fr.net ]- linux linux linux