Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2514 comp.os.linux.misc:16182
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!decwrl!borland.com!xmsb
From: xmsb@borland.com (the MOST SIGNIFICANT bit)
Subject: Re: Linux vs *BSD (new twist)
Message-ID: <xmsb.770665722@druid.borland.com>
Sender: news@borland.com (News Admin)
Organization: Borland International, Scotts Valley, California
X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #5
References: <2sl6o3$pvs@aurora.engr.latech.edu> <2smc4m$daj@Mercury.mcs.com> <DMARPLES.94Jun3102032@voyager.comms.eee.strath.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 1994 17:48:42 GMT
Lines: 20
dmarples@voyager.comms.eee.strath.ac.uk (David Marples) writes:
>I'm pleased that you agree that there is room for both systems to
>co-exist, compliment each other and generally aim for different types
>of users. This tolerant, understanding attitude will help us go
>forward in competing with the likes of NT...
who's competing?
I don't get it. NT is not a bad thing if I don't have
to use it, but can run linux instead. On the other hand,
there is room for NT and linux to coexist (well, not on
the same harddrive :) ), just as there is room for netbsd,
system7, and DOS.
--
Maurice S. Barnum == I speak for me, not my employer.
xmsb@borland.com || "There is no confusion like the
mosigbit@deeptht.armory.com || confusion of a simple mind."
mbarnum@nyx.cs.du.edu == -- F. Scott Fitzgerald