*BSD News Article 31288


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!ieunet!news.ieunet.ie!jkh
From: jkh@whisker.hubbard.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: FAQ: What's the *Right* way to upgrade 1.1G to 1.1R?
Date: 05 Jun 1994 21:49:15 GMT
Organization: Jordan Hubbard
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <JKH.94Jun5214915@whisker.hubbard.ie>
References: <2sfn3k$5e6@meatball.rwwa.com> <C5EPB23@math.fu-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: whisker.hubbard.ie
In-reply-to: gusw@zedat.fu-berlin.de's message of Sun, 5 Jun 1994 11:35:14 GMT

In article <C5EPB23@math.fu-berlin.de> gusw@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Gunther Shadow) writes:

   >There was talk of a binary patch, but I havn't seen anything new show up at
   >FreeBSD.cdrom.com recently.

   [ Just to prevent this from fading out too quickly... ]

The answer must have faded away too quickly too.. :-) As stated
before, the binary patch from 1.1G to 1.1R became just too difficult
(sigh!) due to a change in the profiling code in libc that led to all
the static binaries being rebuilt.  This made the binary patch file
LARGE and somewhat hard to generate as well, so we just released a
source patch.  We're sorry about that, and we certainly intended to
do a binary patch, but circumstances made it necessary to alter that
plan.

					Jordan
--
Jordan K. Hubbard	FreeBSD core team	Friend to mollusks