Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2536 comp.os.linux.misc:16551 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!decwrl!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!stanb From: stanb@netcom.com (Stan Brown) Subject: Re: Linux vs *BSD (new twist) Message-ID: <stanbCqy382.4rG@netcom.com> Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) References: <2sl6o3$pvs@aurora.engr.latech.edu> <2smc4m$daj@Mercury.mcs.com> <DMARPLES.94Jun3102032@voyager.comms.eee.strath.ac.uk> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 1994 22:16:48 GMT Lines: 16 dmarples@voyager.comms.eee.strath.ac.uk (David Marples) writes: >I'm pleased that you agree that there is room for both systems to >co-exist, compliment each other and generally aim for different types >of users. This tolerant, understanding attitude will help us go >forward in competing with the likes of NT... So, could someone give a profile of these different types of users ? As someone trying to decide between the two I would be most interested. -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 404-996-6955 Factory Automation Systems Atlanta Ga. -- DOS ... is still a real mode only non-reentrant interrupt handler, and always will be. -Russell Williams