Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2549 comp.os.linux.misc:16630 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!newsfeed.pitt.edu!gatech!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!nobody From: peter@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Linux vs *BSD (new twist) Date: 6 Jun 1994 19:09:10 -0500 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 684 5969 Lines: 8 Message-ID: <2t0dr6$4c3@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: <2smc4m$daj@Mercury.mcs.com> <WAYNE.94Jun3224657@backbone.uucp> <2spm91$1b2@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <1994Jun6.095836.5606@uk.ac.swan.pyr> NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com In article <1994Jun6.095836.5606@uk.ac.swan.pyr>, Alan Cox <iiitac@uk.ac.swan.pyr> wrote: >The no-feature attitude is also the reason why half the shells Im forced to >use on other machines don't have sensible command line editing. You got a C compiler, don't you? So why are you forced to use these inadequate shells?