Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!gateway.univel.com!gateway.novell.com!thisbe!terry From: terry@thisbe.npd.Novell.COM (Terry Lambert) Subject: Re: Hang up on heavy disk load (Re: Adaptec SCSI bug?) Message-ID: <1992Aug5.171033.28596@gateway.novell.com> Sender: terry@thisbe (Terry Lambert) Nntp-Posting-Host: thisbe.eng.sandy.novell.com Organization: Novell NPD -- Sandy, UT References: <1992Jul30.210037.9265@ninja.zso.dec.com> <1992Jul31.002259.29940@gateway.novell.com> <1992Aug3.150008.188@cotton.nc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <1992Aug3.195717.26165@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> <scott.712957192@pita> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1992 17:10:33 GMT Lines: 25 In article <scott.712957192@pita>, scott@pita.cns.ucla.edu (Scott Burris) writes: [ ... Description of disk-use lockup deleted ... ] |> Well, if this is the same problem I've been having, the kernel is deadlocking |> sleeping on something called "temp" which appears to be a temporary |> memory allocator. I've seen problems when I've built a new kernel |> and immediately try copying it into the root filesystem. If I do a |> sync first and wait for it to complete, there's no problem. Anyone willing to: 1) Put up, for FTP download, a "dist.fs" with 'sync' on it? 2) Put up, for FTP download, a "dist.fs" with sync(2) called after every write(2) in install? I'm pretty much willing to try anything (except purchasing an IDE drive, that is). Terry Lambert terry_lambert@gateway.novell.com terry@icarus.weber.edu --- Disclaimer: Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.