Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!library.ucla.edu!news.mic.ucla.edu!ux1.lmu.edu!s069.infonet.net!s069.infonet.net!not-for-mail From: burgess@s069.infonet.net (Dave Burgess) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.linux.help! Subject: Re: BSD vs Linux Date: 7 Jun 1994 20:44:34 -0500 Organization: /etc/orgainzation Lines: 28 Message-ID: <2t37q2$8q@s069.infonet.net> References: <2sva1p$llr@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: s069.infonet.net Keywords: BSD, Linux In article <2sva1p$llr@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au>, Louis Cypher <s9202733@yallara.cs.rmit.OZ.AU> wrote: > >Could someone please point out the relative advantages & disadvantages >of both netBSD and Linux 'slackware'. > >Which is better? Easier to use etc etc. > No. Read the 386BSD FAQ Section 0. There is a rather exhaustive list of differences between the free Unices (short synosis for those too lazy to do their homework: Too few to make the discussion worth while). Of course, if you wanted to go through the newsgroup, I'm sure that you could find that this thread has already wasted more time and money than buying a commercial OS. So rather than ask the question, why don't you just buy one of those and leave us alone.... -- TSgt Dave Burgess | Dave Burgess NCOIC, USSTRATCOM/J6844 | *BSD FAQ Maintainer Offutt AFB, NE | Burgess@cynjut.infonet.net or ...@s069.infonet...