Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:11164 gnu.misc.discuss:15383 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,gnu.misc.discuss Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sunic!isgate!veda.is!adam From: adam@veda.is (Adam David) Subject: Re: Taylor UUCP on FreeBSD??? Organization: Veda Systems, Iceland Message-ID: <Crv3M7.K3D@veda.is> References: <1994Jun13.040754.17764@kosman.uucp> <GOWEN.94Jun21084913@presto.cs.tufts.edu> <2u73ti$egn@glitnir.ifi.uio.no> <RSANDERS.94Jun21155032@hrothgar.mindspring.com> <2u7tcb$6mr@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <RSANDERS.94Jun22110639@hrothgar.mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 18:06:06 GMT Lines: 16 rsanders@mindspring.com (Robert Sanders) writes: >The fact is that you chose a broken ash over a much less broken bash >as your /bin/sh, and unless you plan to fix ash's bugs, it's not a >very wise decision. You want me to fix ash? Sure. > rm /bin/sh > ln /bin/bash /bin/sh >There. Now it works. :-) Is there anything wrong with the idea of compiling bash without all the ineractive trappings, specifically for use as /bin/sh ? -- Adam David <adam@veda.is>