Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2754 comp.os.linux.misc:19937 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!news.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.clark.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!gt-news!prism!cc.gatech.edu!gemini.cc.gatech.edu!byron From: byron@gemini.cc.gatech.edu (Byron A Jeff) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: I hope this won't ignite a major flame war, but I've got to know! Date: 20 Jul 1994 12:12:45 GMT Organization: none Lines: 21 Message-ID: <30j4bt$76a@solaria.cc.gatech.edu> References: <30drlt$7tc@news.u.washington.edu> <newcombe.351.00A6A2B3@aa.csc.peachnet.edu> <mrg.774688509@dynamo> NNTP-Posting-Host: gemini.cc.gatech.edu NNTP-Posting-User: byron In article <mrg.774688509@dynamo>, matthew green <mrg@mame.mu.OZ.AU> wrote: > >this is not intended as a flame to any of the authors cited. > > >byron@cc.gatech.edu (Byron A Jeff) writes: >>Well Linux is Posix compliant which means it has features of >>both SV and BSD but favors SV. > >to me, you're hinting that netbsd and freebsd are not posix >compliant, which is plain wrong. I implied so such thing. I cannot comment in any way, shape, form, or fashion on any of the BSD variants because I've never used any of them. I comment on Linux only because that's what I use. BAJ -- Another random extraction from the mental bit stream of... Byron A. Jeff - PhD student operating in parallel - And Using Linux! Georgia Tech, Atlanta GA 30332 Internet: byron@cc.gatech.edu