Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!stanford.edu!hsdndev!ceylon!transfer!jjmhome!alden!alden.UUCP!sgr
From: sgr@alden.UUCP
Newsgroups: alt.suit.att-bsdi,comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: UNIGRAM's article on the USL-BSDI suit
Message-ID: <503@alden.UUCP>
Date: 5 Aug 92 15:45:05 GMT
References: <1992Aug3.143259.23897@crd.ge.com> <1992Aug3.161015.7120@doc.ic.ac.uk> <7052@skye.ed.ac.uk>
Sender: usenet@alden.UUCP
Reply-To: sgr@alden.UUCP
Followup-To: alt.suit.att-bsdi
Organization: (Actually, very disorganized)
Lines: 17
In article <7052@skye.ed.ac.uk> jeff@aiai.ed.ac.uk (Jeff Dalton) writes:
[...]
>It's beginning to look like USL may not have any solid evidence
>at all. Perhaps they expect that a 3rd party will find some
>similarities (how could they not, between similar operating
>systems?) and then plan to claim that their case is proved by
>whatever similarities are found.
Gee, doesn't this whole thing remind you of the horror stories
one hears about IRS audits? "Let us search your books and see
if we can find any little screwup!" Maybe USL has some ex-IRS
employees!
Stan.
--
This .signature has expired. Call 1-900-YOU-FOOL to find out why.
Stan Ryckman sgr@alden.UUCP