Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!news.dell.com!tadpole.com!uunet!autodesk.com!greywolf From: greywolf@autodesk.com (James Graham - Systems Anarchist) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: 4.4-lite? Date: 20 Jul 1994 02:04:50 GMT Organization: Autodesk, Inc. Lines: 20 Message-ID: <30i0o2$nss@autodesk.autodesk.com> References: <2vgvc7$3tg@spruce.cic.net> <Zi2ziVX.dysonj@delphi.com> <30em65$g17@autodesk.autodesk.com> <Ze9RiNY.dysonj@delphi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lonewolf.autodesk.com [ probably better in email, but... ] John Dyson <dysonj@delphi.com> writes in <Ze9RiNY.dysonj@delphi.com> /* * (BTW where did you get the notion of * running NT? Are you talking about an X86?? NT is very slow and sluggish. * *BSD (except for applications base) is MUCH better and faster.) I am not * going to sacrifice my work on FreeBSD (kernel enhancements), but I will * spearhead a SUN effort. Oh, believe me, running NT has never been my intention -- I do that at work. :-( I was just illustrating why I don't want to trade in my Sun for an x86 box. * * John * dyson@implode.root.com */ -- Solaris 2 is not an upgrade from Solaris 1. They just want you to THINK it is.