Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!netnews.upenn.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!mvb.saic.com!news.cerf.net!ccnet.com!ccnet.com!not-for-mail From: jantypas@ccnet.com (John Antypas) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Anyone ever add a proc fs to BSD? Date: 26 Jul 1994 09:36:22 -0700 Organization: CCnet Communications Lines: 28 Message-ID: <313e26$rau@ccnet.ccnet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ccnet Hello BSD FS gurus! With all of the traffic going on in comp.unix.bsd, I'm sure someone will know the answer to my question. [ Standard Flame Protection Activated ] I have two Unici. I have BSDI 1.1, the system in question, and Linux At work I run on AIX 3.2, SUN-OS 4.1.3 and even an old Interactive Sys V.3.2 (2.2.x). I love them all - for they are Unix, and they are good (well, the ISC has a few problems, but its old and cranky -- but I just can't throw it out. It's trying, I can feel it -- even if it doesn't support much.) I would gladly take them all home to live with me if (a) I had a disk farm and (b) other people didn't insist I needed money for other things like heat, food, or maybe a mortgage. [ Protection Noted ] Well, now that I'm covered, I need to know: Has anyone ever added a proc fs into a BSDI varient before? (BSDI 1.1 would be great). In theory, the fs work isn't nasty, the real trick will be getting at process context and memory pages. Any pointers that I can look at? -- John Antypas@21st Century Softwware (jantypas@soft21.s21.com) "God is too busy to create chaos and disorder in this world, he can't be everywhere at once all of the time, That's why he made two year olds" "