Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.misc:2841 comp.os.linux.misc:20339 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.linux.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!news.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.clark.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.tc.cornell.edu!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!cornell!mdw From: mdw@cs.cornell.edu (Matt Welsh) Subject: Re: Usefulness of BSD/Linux Source Knowledge (was BSD vs. LINUX) Message-ID: <1994Jul26.214343.24076@cs.cornell.edu> Followup-To: alt.dev.null Organization: Cornell CS Robotics and Vision Laboratory, Ithaca, NY 14850 References: <CtEuyA.En1@world.std.com> <1994Jul24.185248.5906@escape.widomaker.com> <313tkg$nhd@Mercury.mcs.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 1994 21:43:43 GMT Lines: 15 In article <313tkg$nhd@Mercury.mcs.com> dleeds@MCS.COM (Daniel Leeds) writes: >: Because BSD is dead. I wish it were not so because I prefer BSD but >: SVR4.2 is the future of UNIX, not BSD. You actually made a wrong >: choice by your own critieria. > >Funny, I am running BSD right now. My machine is functioning and pretty >fucking good thank you. As for development there is alot of BSD >development going on right now, just not from Berkeley's commercial entity. Same here, but I'm running DOS 3.3 on my Apple II+. It's functioning and pretty *darn* good, I'd say. This whole Apple II is dead crap just doesn't add up. M. Welsh, followups to alt.whine.my.os.is.better.than.yours