Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!news2.near.net!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!ai-lab!life.ai.mit.edu!mycroft From: mycroft@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles M. Hannum) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Which 386-BSD is reliable? Date: 08 Aug 1994 07:43:27 GMT Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab Lines: 24 Message-ID: <MYCROFT.94Aug8034327@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> References: <pmiles.776112888@tdc> NNTP-Posting-Host: duality.ai.mit.edu In-reply-to: pmiles@tdc.dircon.co.uk's message of 5 Aug 1994 20:05:30 +0100 In article <pmiles.776112888@tdc> pmiles@tdc.dircon.co.uk (Peter Miles) writes: This is for running on a Pentium-based PC system with Adaptec SCSI controller and SCSI drives. Network card will probably be a 3COM EISA one. We hope to run INN, to enable our users to access news over the LAN. Can anyone send me their experiences of BSDI (and FreeBSD or NetBSD). I presume the ethernet card you're referring to is a 3c579? I can't speak for the other two, but such a configuration should work well with NetBSD. -- - Charles Hannum NetBSD group Working ports: i386, hp300, amiga, sun4c, mac68k, pc532, da30. In progress: sun3, pmax, vax, sun4m, alpha, sun4.