*BSD News Article 34588


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:12503 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3289
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.duke.edu!zombie.ncsc.mil!cs.umd.edu!ra.nrl.navy.mil!sundance!cmetz
From: cmetz@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil (Craig Metz)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Whats wrong with Linux networking ???
Date: 10 Aug 1994 21:06:08 GMT
Organization: Information Technology Division, Naval Research Laboratory
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <32bfg0$sol@ra.nrl.navy.mil>
References: <Cu8CBr.Fx@calcite.rhyolite.com> <328d6v$s0p@ra.nrl.navy.mil> <CuACx4.Etu@rex.uokhsc.edu> <CuBw0A.Ayy@calcite.rhyolite.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil

In article <CuBw0A.Ayy@calcite.rhyolite.com>,
Vernon Schryver <vjs@calcite.rhyolite.com> wrote:
>>	Even for the exercise itself, it is essential to do things over
>>in order to see if it can be done better. Sometimes all that is gained in
>>such a thing is insight into the problem. Sometimes room for improvement
>>is found and the status quo is raised. The only thing that is certain is
>>that not doing anything will certainly get you nowhere. 
>
>That's wrong as stated.  Only a student, amateur, or incompetent needs
>to rewrite code "in order to see if it can be done better," "insight
>into the problem," or see what to do to raise the status quo.

	So, you are advocating never doing anything new?

>I used to grumble "4.* BSD is student code while System V is COBOL code."
>4.2 and before had a lot of code that would have been better to not have
>been written or rewritten, except that writing it presumably trained
>people.  To the extent that people working on each of FreeBSD, NetBSD,
>and Linux are compelled to rewrite without looking at alternatives, you
>must expect the results to be at best "student code."

	So now FreeBSD and NetBSD don't meet your standards, either? Or
do new things just not meet your standards?

								-Craig