Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!csusac!csus.edu!netcom.com!jmonroy
From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr)
Subject: Re: PCMCIA support on FreeBSD/NetBsd
Message-ID: <jmonroyCv2Jvv.CFH@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1]
References: <328pt4$pbp@flipper.rsmas.miami.edu> <JKH.94Aug10115802@freefall.cdrom.com> <FOO-MAN.94Aug23195951@raven.raven.csrv.uidaho.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 1994 02:21:31 GMT
Lines: 133
Faried Nawaz (foo-man@raven.csrv.uidaho.edu) wrote:
: In article <jmonroyCuwurq.Gur@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes:
: Well, as I believe you don't speak for everyone
: and perhaps this is a question that you'd like
: answered, let's continue.
: do you speak for bill? yes or no. tell us, now -- yes or no?
:
You didn't quote the person I quoted.
don't waste time.bandwidth, or your employeers time
if you have this kind of defectinve processes.
: If you believe that your code might be of
: some advantage to users, then it is concievable (sp?)
: that you might want to port your "wares" to as many
: platforms as possible. In the past, Bill's
: release have been very compliant with *BSD style
: and flavor. So for the highest degree of protability
: one might consider porting one's code to 386BSD Release 1.0.
: are you working on a port of 386bsd 1.0 to the powermacs? after all, in
: your words, 'if you believe that your code might be of some advantage to
: users, then it is concievable (sp?) that you might want to port your
: "wares" to as many platforms as possible.'
:
you are still not quoteing the original message.
This is a tactic used by politcal entities to confuse
the subject. ther is also name calling, bandwagoning,
appealing to higher authority.
There is more. They give lesson in school about this,
maybe you missed it. Let's talk about computer
science. Quite this finger pointing crap and
get on in life. Because I'm not going to. further,
waste my time on these types of idiotic references.
BTW, it's "i" before "e", except when proceeded by
r,c,v and x. (i think)
: who's working on porting 386bsd to non-bsd platforms? no one? netbsd
: works on atleast six different platforms. when 386bsd can do that, come
: back and tell us (we eagerly await your posts).
: Your commnet about attribution are quite incorrect,
: they are false, and to date most people making claims
: as such have been proven by electronic record that
: such claims were incorrect.
: if it's not on paper, it's not true. want someone to fake-post a message
: to comp.os.386bsd.* saying that you love small boys? i mean, that should
: be proven by "electronic record".
:
yes, you love small boys the world knows. I will send you a small
boy by US mail today. Let's talk about computer science.
CAn We?
: My premise is that, perhaps, some code you submitted
: was substandard or not documented professional manner
: or your just a puzt.
: what i mean to say is that all you've said is irrelevant, you're acting
: unprofessionally, and you are a putz. and that's a certainity. tell me --
: does the fact that no one on the 'net has supported you mean anything?
: perhaps, maybe, you could be WRONG?!?
:
Well, since I don't know who the original poster is
I'll assume I have an imposter. (hohoho that was good.)
Well, if someone on the "net" talked about computer science
in a follow-up to me I might believe I am talking to a professional
When I get responses like this I mostly assume I have
a freshman.
: If your code was of any consequence, you would have
: received some e-mail from Bill or Lynn. And if you
: did not and your code was used by them you will
: receive proper attribution.
: if your message was of any consequence, i would believe you.
: Mr. VanLoon,
: Your concluding run-on sentence is the
: most illogical statement to date.
: you, however, have yet to see a logical statement from anyone who uses
: {free,net}bsd, am i correct?
There we go I was talking to Vanloon.
Let's make this assumtion folks, several students
of a less than meaningfull consequence don't like
Bill. They take turns sending nasty messages to
people on these newsgroups.
Is this a fantasy in my mind?
Am I on drugs?
surely, I must be. because It makes no sense
why this flame trail is follwing me around, with
the same theme, from about 12 people.
Yes, I must report to a hospital soon.
Jordan, please call me a straight jacket.
: By all means if your code is running on
: NetBSD it's worth is known, but if
: your code (or anyone's for that matter) is
: in 386bsd Release 1.0 there is no way
: hell you can tell me it's there, unless
: maybe you have privy information from
: Bill, Lynn or the author of such
: software, which it seems you don't.
: neither can you.
: tell me how you know that your code is in 386bsd 1.0?
:
Yes, Bill says, "I'm using your code, Jesse."
: again: are you the official voice for bill on the (bad) 'net?
:
you know since I've receive this question from
approx. 6 people. wwith similar spelling problems,
I can now safely assume that several people will
loss privleges.
--
Jesus Monroy Jr jmonroy@netcom.com
Zebra Research
/386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation
___________________________________________________________________________