Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:12661 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3394 comp.unix.bsd:14708 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!convex!hermes.oc.com!news.kei.com!MathWorks.Com!news2.near.net!das-news.harvard.edu!spdcc!merk!rmkhome!rmk From: rmk@rmkhome.com (Rick Kelly) Subject: Re: [REPOST] Details on the 386BSD Release 1.0 CD-ROM Organization: The Man With Ten Cats Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd References: <jmonroyCutor9.n4o@netcom.com> Message-ID: <9408252241.36@rmkhome.com> Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.com (Rick Kelly) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Date: Fri, 26 Aug 1994 03:41:38 GMT Lines: 29 Jesus Monroy Jr (jmonroy@netcom.com) wrote: : : As many news sites have lost the original posting : I am *REPOSTING* the original article for those : that seem to be confused. : JESUS!!! (No, that doesn't sound right.) CHRIST!!! (No, that sounds worse.) You are waving around vaporware in the faces of a group of people who have two (2) viable free BSD solutions and one commercial BSD solution. NetBSD, FreeBSD, and BSDI are all being used for serious work. They are reasonably stable for production and development. They can be fixed up with all the latest UNIX weenie PD toys. 386BSD 1.0 may be the operating system straight from GOD himself ( although I thought that was Plan 9), but spamming people with hype about something that they can't acquire is a total wast of energy, bandwidth, and the UARTS in my system. *PLONK* -- Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.com rmk@bedford.progress.com