Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:12825 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3448 comp.unix.bsd:14810 Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!csusac!csus.edu!netcom.com!jmonroy From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) Subject: Re: [REPOST] Details on the 386BSD Release 1.0 CD-ROM Message-ID: <jmonroyCvGrt7.GD0@netcom.com> Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL1] References: <jmonroyCutor9.n4o@netcom.com> <33j0r3$lit@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu> <jmonroyCv9tFC.IAt@netcom.com> <33so55$pck@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu> <jmonroyCvDy5n.M9z@netcom.com> <341v3k$d7m@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 1994 18:39:07 GMT Lines: 73 James Michael Chacon (jmc@ksu.ksu.edu) wrote: : jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes: : >James Michael Chacon (jmc@ksu.ksu.edu) wrote: : >: From the past history of Bill and Lynn, most people have very little faith : >: in waiting for vaporware from them anymore....Yet, you keep posting and : >: reposting this dribble I guess in the vain hope someone somewhere will stand : >: up for it too... : >: : > I love the word "most", as if it real had some value, it : > is tossed from room to room.... and the validity for your : > unmeasured response is overwhelming.... : > BTW, it's drivel.... I've been told.. :-) : Ok, since you obviously keep posting this stuff since someone else wants : to see it to, who is that? : I don't keep a list. As it is incoveint. : I have yet to see anyone defending : 386bsd 1.0 (or should I say vaporware?) other than yourself. I can draw : enough of a conclusion just from that. : Who's defending 386bsd release 1.0? I am simply making announcement as to it availability. Further, if you'd like to dicuss some of the real features of 386bsd release 1.0, I will post the features mentioned by Bill at the SVNET metting.... If you'd like to draw a conclusion from something, think about this: why are some many people (and I won't name names) bad mouthing something they haven't seen, especially since they were at the SVNET meeting -- like I? Is it possible that the new features that Bill is adding have not made it to the other *bsd variants? Are the other *bsd variants afraid that if I start talking about the new features..... that maybe they'll look bad? you tell me! : Lets do a quick scan back through looking at all the threads started by : your announcement...I see no one supporting 386bsd anymore, and as a matter : of fact I see only you. And in what seems a desparate attempt to find anyone : who will support it, you continually repost the same garbage over and over : again like it's something wonderful and new. : Anymore? hardly a valid claim. Repost of the same garbage? Next thing you'll tell me is that the weekly announcements of the *bsd mailing list on comp.os.386bsd.announce is reposted garbage!... Hardly! : I could understand reposting this announcement if someone actaully gave a : damn, but no one seems to.... : It's obvious as to your position. Lastly, to complement your ignorance, thse newsgroups are for 386bsd and information about the Unix OS. Maybe you'd prefer working with NT. -- Jesus Monroy Jr jmonroy@netcom.com Zebra Research /386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation ___________________________________________________________________________