Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:12846 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3451 comp.unix.bsd:14819 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!barrnet.net!oz.cdrom.com!oz.cdrom.com!jkh From: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: [REPOST] Details on the 386BSD Release 1.0 CD-ROM Date: 02 Sep 1994 14:38:12 GMT Organization: Walnut Creek CD-ROM Lines: 12 Distribution: world Message-ID: <JKH.94Sep2073812@freefall.cdrom.com> References: <jmonroyCutor9.n4o@netcom.com> <jmonroyCvDy5n.M9z@netcom.com> <341v3k$d7m@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu> <jmonroyCvGrt7.GD0@netcom.com> <345j75$knq@agate.berkeley.edu> <346769$fkc@cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: freefall.cdrom.com In-reply-to: bhiksha+@CS.CMU.EDU's message of 2 Sep 1994 03:46:17 GMT In article <346769$fkc@cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu> bhiksha+@CS.CMU.EDU (Bhiksha Raj) writes: I wouldnt make such powerful statements if I were you Jordan. Considering the rate of the FreeBSD releases, 10.0 may not be very far off... And if it couldnt run on a casio wristwatch you'd have to eat these words :-) Hmmmm. Then I guess we'd have to delay and delay and delay the release until we got the Casio stuff working, and in the meantime everyone would go off and run a different *BSD. You're right - that would be too foolish a strategy to contemplate.. :-) Jordan