Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:12852 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3453 comp.unix.bsd:14825 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!newsfeed.ACO.net!Austria.EU.net!EU.net!uunet!jaring.my!oasys!othman From: othman@oasys.pc.my (Othman bin Hj. Ahmad) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: [REPOST] Details on the 386BSD Release 1.0 CD-ROM Message-ID: <uVBVRc1w165w@oasys.pc.my> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 94 18:17:29 MAL References: <341v3k$d7m@cbs.ksu.ksu.edu> Distribution: world Organization: Personal,Kota Kinabalu,Sabah,Malaysia Lines: 42 jmc@ksu.ksu.edu (James Michael Chacon) writes: > jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes: > > >James Michael Chacon (jmc@ksu.ksu.edu) wrote: ..... > Ok, since you obviously keep posting this stuff since someone else wants > to see it to, who is that? I have yet to see anyone defending I do. So stop saying that nobody cares. When linux and 386bsd was just started, they all cross-posted to other groups. 386bsd 1.0 is revolutionary in concept that it is worthwhile to post to many newsgroups. The revolution is in the built-in book on internals of BSD. > 386bsd 1.0 (or should I say vaporware?) other than yourself. I can draw > enough of a conclusion just from that. There are people who are willing to wait just as we had waited for a more stable *BSD and Linux, not that I'm against any of these groups. Whatever weakness the Jolitzes had, it is their right to pursue it the way they want it to. > > Lets do a quick scan back through looking at all the threads started by > your announcement...I see no one supporting 386bsd anymore, and as a matter Many people support it in silence. > of fact I see only you. And in what seems a desparate attempt to find anyone > who will support it, you continually repost the same garbage over and over What he posted was not garbage and I appreciate its contents and understand its lack of info at the moment. > again like it's something wonderful and new. > > I could understand reposting this announcement if someone actaully gave a > damn, but no one seems to.... Don't try to speak on behalf of other people. Futhermore, loundness does not always mean popularity and rightness. Disclaimer: I only speak for myself. SABAH is Heaven. Perpetual Clear Blue Sky, Sea and Mountains near modern civilisations, but how long will this last?