Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!altger!stasys!sungy!seven-up.East.Sun.COM!news2me.ebay.sun.com!exodus.Eng.Sun.COM!appserv.Eng.Sun.COM!slovax.Eng.Sun.COM!lm From: lm@slovax.Eng.Sun.COM (Larry McVoy) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!! Message-ID: <l8hhhkINN695@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 12 Aug 92 08:05:08 GMT References: <166cciINNr2o@agate.berkeley.edu> Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Mt. View, Ca. Lines: 29 NNTP-Posting-Host: slovax bostic@toe.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Keith Bostic) writes: : In article <1992Aug8.160024.3222@sceard.Sceard.COM> mrm@sceard.COM (M.R.Murphy) writes: : >How I love it when the copyright blather takes more space in a source : >distribution than the code itself. See USL /bin/true and CSRG : >/usr/include/strings.h. Couldn't it just be included once or read into the : >record, or assumed, or inserted with a TECO macro built into the kernel? It is : >wasteful of disk space and offensive to sensitive people. : : It can't be included once and fulfill its purpose, the lawyers we've : consulted are consistent on that one. : : To argue that it should only be put in "files that are sufficiently : important", while logically appealing, is not reasonable. To reword : your request, you want me to make a decision on a file-by-file basis : for a system with thousands of files, and then revisit the decision : every time a file is modified. I don't think I get paid enough for that. I don't mind the copyrights as long as they don't get in my face. How about one of these: 1) #include <sys/copyright.h> 2) Put the @%$! copyright at the *bottom* of the file instead of the top. Surely the lawyers can't tell the difference, right? I'd be happy to provide a perl script that does #2. For the whole BSD source base. --- Larry McVoy (415) 336-7627 lm@sun.com