*BSD News Article 36315


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!gmi!zombie.ncsc.mil!MathWorks.Com!yeshua.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gumby!andrews-cc!gillham
From: gillham@andrews.edu (Andrew Gillham)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: DooM for NetBSD, will it become a reality
Date: 29 Sep 1994 20:28:16 GMT
Organization: Andrews University
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <36f810$3gj@orion.cc.andrews.edu>
References: <36c2o6$jea@agate.berkeley.edu> <1994Sep29.000430.9809@umr.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: edmund.cs.andrews.edu

In article <1994Sep29.000430.9809@umr.edu> dhickman@rocket.cc.umr.edu (David H Hickman ) writes:
>
>well i am not BIFF. But to tell you the truth it is so interestin how 
>people view their os as a religion. Right now I thing linux is the best
>but to tell you the truth the instant something better comes out i will
>put it on one of my machines. Especally if either Linux or bsd come out with
>a FREE mach version. that is the major weakness of Linux is it is so damn
>monolithic. But you do see versions of bsd floting around on alot of
>machines.... 

Ah yes, a pulpit pounder in disquise...  So what's the religion this
week?  My personal favorites are:

First Church of UNIX
The Church of Jesus Monroy of Latter Day UNIX
The Roman Context-Switching Church
Linux - The CHURCH of a GNU Generation

Uhmm, guess I'm done..

>well i do run 132x80 in text mode. but i am rarelry in text mode unless X is screwed up
>
>So i usually run color Xterm  which does all of the usual text wraping and stuff.
>

Text raping?  What will you guys think of next?

>ok i guess i am  willing to give a honest look at bsd if it can meet these specs.
>1. ext2fs support. 

Hmm, seems this is a "Invented in Linux land" filesystem, why expect
*anything* to support this??  (except Linux)

>2. fat file system support.

MSDOSFS or PCFS is in there.  So is FFS. (Fast File System)

>3. how good is bsd iBCS2 emulation. It must be able to run WP5.1 and Corel Draw.

Sounds to me like you should be using DOS/Windows if that's all you want
to run.

>4. X must be able to run 1152 900 resolution. ( anything lower sucks)

Well vacuum boy, every heard of XFree86?  Seems like it runs on *BSD and
Linux, and, and, and...

>5. GUS support.

FreeBSD has this.

>6. proven SLIP support.

Yup, SLIP and PPP qre *quite* proven and stable on *BSD.

>If there is a distrubution of BSD that supports this I will ftp it and try it out. 
>hell, as i said i will probally try it out on one of my machines.

FreeBSD supports most of what you ask for. (except iBCS2)
DOS/Windows supports *everything* you ask for. (except ext2fs whatever)

Are you sure you're not really a DOS user in disquise?

>***********************************************************************
>**  " Why would you want to run UNIX when you can run RISC ... "     **
>**		- A South West Missouri CIS Graduate with  a 4.0     **
>***********************************************************************

How about:  "Switched hubs will eventually be replacing routers" (my boss?)

-Andrew

PS.  Ok, Ok, I just couldn't help myself flaming just a little.

-- 
==========================================================
Andrew Gillham                       gillham@andrews.edu
LAN/WAN/Netware/Unix Analyst         gillham@whirlpool.com
==========================================================