Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26013 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3601
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!jwjohn
From: jwjohn@ecst.csuchico.edu (Jerry W Johnson)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one?
Date: 3 Oct 1994 06:59:38 GMT
Organization: California State University, Chico
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <36oa4q$4rn@charnel.ecst.CSUChico.EDU>
References: <36djkn$nm8@girtab.usc.edu> <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ghoul.ecst.csuchico.edu
Keywords: mosaic term telnet
In article <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu>,
Nate Williams <nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu> wrote:
>In article <36djkn$nm8@girtab.usc.edu>, Po-Han Lin <plin@girtab.usc.edu> wrote:
>You were misinformed. Both Linux and the BSD's use monolithic kernels.
>For a fun discussion of this, there is a series of articles were Linus
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>and Andy Tanenbaum 'discussed' the merits of both of these when Linux
>was in it's infancy.
>Nate
[snip nate's sig]
Might anyone have or know where these articles might be obtained,
please? Maybe a more detailed "when", too?
TIA. Cheers, --Jerry
--
||=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-||"Thus, the claim about object orientation usually||
||Jerry W. Johnson ||means only that their latest release was coded in||
||jwjohn@ecst.csuchico.edu||C++. Big bloody deal." Yourdan,The Decline & Fall||
||=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-||-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-||