Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26220 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3624
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!jussieu.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!swidir.switch.ch!newsfeed.ACO.net!Austria.EU.net!EU.net!sun4nl!news.nic.surfnet.nl!news.kub.nl!paai
From: paai@kub.nl (J.J. Paijmans)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one?
Date: 5 Oct 1994 19:19:04 GMT
Organization: Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <36uu78$7e4@kubds1.kub.nl>
References: <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <jeffpkCx4wtM.B64@netcom.com> <Cx7Fwx.qLH@ns1.nodak.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kubix.kub.nl
Keywords: mosaic term telnet
In article <Cx7Fwx.qLH@ns1.nodak.edu> tinguely@plains.NoDak.edu (Mark Tinguely) writes:
...
>
>3) there is a slight culture difference between all of the groups. IMO, Linux
> is more DOS friendly, *BSD are more DOS-phobic. NetBSD is multi-platform,
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ummm. If I see what the "DOS friendly" linux users here have to say about
DOS and MS-Windows, it certainly makes me curious how the DOS-phobic
BSD crowd talk about the Microsoft world... :-)
Paai