Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26260 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3628 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!munnari.oz.au!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!bonkers.taronga.com!peter From: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one? Organization: Taronga Park BBS Message-ID: <Cx6IFy.JC7@bonkers.taronga.com> References: <36djkn$nm8@girtab.usc.edu> <36qeaf$jt4@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <MICHAELV.94Oct4095313@mindbender.headcandy.com> Date: Wed, 5 Oct 1994 02:47:58 GMT Lines: 9 In article <MICHAELV.94Oct4095313@mindbender.headcandy.com>, Michael L. VanLoon <michaelv@MindBender.HeadCandy.com> wrote: >This should be taken with a large bucket of salt, however (as Terry >Lambert points out), since none of the systems have had an official >POSIX verification suite run on them. Not to mention that in practical terms POSIX still means very little. Most code is still written straight to System V or BSD semantics.