Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.misc:26677 comp.os.386bsd.misc:3687 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!gmi!zombie.ncsc.mil!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!info!iialan From: iialan@iifeak.swan.ac.uk (Alan Cox) Subject: Re: Nailed down to 386bsd or linux, now which one? Message-ID: <CxGxoz.97u@info.swan.ac.uk> Sender: news@info.swan.ac.uk Nntp-Posting-Host: iifeak.swan.ac.uk Organization: Institute For Industrial Information Technology References: <36nd1u$d80@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <jeffpkCx4wtM.B64@netcom.com> <36sa1i$1l7@quagga.ru.ac.za> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 1994 17:53:23 GMT Lines: 13 In article <36sa1i$1l7@quagga.ru.ac.za> csgr@cs.ru.ac.za writes: >(I wouldn't hazard a guess on how soon after a source change is made >in Linux, it becomes available to the general hacking public.) It's normally available first, then debugged then submitted into the main kernel. Of course people who play with alpha test code do so at their own risk Alan -- ..-----------,,----------------------------,,----------------------------,, // Alan Cox // iialan@www.linux.org.uk // GW4PTS@GB7SWN.#45.GBR.EU // ``----------'`----------------------------'`----------------------------''