Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!agate!phr From: phr@soda.berkeley.edu (Paul Rubin) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Restrictions on 'free' UNIX / 386BSD (Re: selling 386BSD) Date: 15 Aug 92 15:11:00 Organization: CSUA/UCB Lines: 18 Message-ID: <PHR.92Aug15151100@soda.berkeley.edu> References: x <l8n8qcINN2c5@neuro.usc.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: soda.berkeley.edu In-reply-to: merlin@neuro.usc.edu's message of 14 Aug 92 12:13:00 GMT If people like cgd really feel obligated to contribute 'contaminated' code then their contributions should be made available separately from the free redistributable core -- preferably in a separate 'restricted' distribution -- and clearly labeled 'infectious waste' -- with ample warnings to future users of such code about potential intellectual property rights claims and intellectual health risks. In my opinion the same label should be applied to anything carrying the even more restrictive GNU copyleft. Try to think a little more clearly. It is the ABSENCE of copyleft that leads to the possibility of non-freely-redistributable versions. The copyleft was designed to prevent that from happening. If 386bsd was copylefted, these flames wouldn't be happening. Paul Rubin Copylefts 'R' Us