Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!uwm.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!uunet!demos1!glas!demos1!sun0.urz.uni-heidelbe!orion.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de!andreas From: andreas@orion.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Date: 14 Oct 94 23:55 GMT+0300 Subject: Re: We a FAQ: Linux vs. *BSD!!! Message-ID: <37mr7m$mfd@sun0.urz.uni-heidelbe> References: <jmonroyCxLro2.IF6@netcom.com> Sender: Notesfile to Usenet Gateway <notes@glas.apc.org> Lines: 16 Ken Hughes (hughes@napa.eng.uop.edu) wrote: : I wonder how the Windows-DOS-OS/2 people react to these questions? Does : anyone ever ask over in those groups? Or is everyone there resigned to the : fact that OS/2 is best or Windows is best or Chicago/Windows 95 will be best : or that they're all SOL? :-) You only have to look at the multiple 100 post flamewars that regulary come up in comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy. The Windows solution is simply to assign a special newsgroup for this discussion. Andreas -- * Andreas Helke, Institut fuer molekulare Genetik, Universitaet Heidelberg ** Im Neuenheimer Feld 230, 69122 Heidelberg, Germany *** orion.mgen.uni-heidelberg.de has a ftp server with Unix tools for DOS **** and with the HFM V. 4.02 DOS file manager and archive program shell